- (january 2017)
"Vladimir" Trump's unstoppable march towards the Russification of the USA.
It is telling that
there are calls for "unity" from every quarter, including Barack Obama,
but we are supposed to unite only in one direction: meekly accepting Vladimir Trump as the legitimate president of the USA.
This is a sign that we live in an increasingly totalitarian age.
There are actually an infinite number of ways in which a nation can "unite",
and uniting behind a vulgar crook, charlatan, traitor and impostor doesn't
seem to me the best way. Uniting against him, for example, is another one.
But you are supposed to think
and act according to predefined rules and regulations, just like when a
conference website asks you "are you excited about the future" and the
only option is "yes" (i just saw this when trying to register)
or when facebook gives you a Like button but not a Dislike button.
In my opinion there is a better way to unite: the nation should unite
in restoring decency and integrity to the presidency, and in appeasing the
terror generated around the free democratic world by the 2016 US election.
Some will say that we should wait and see what he does. But he's the one
who (without a mandate from the people) pledged to take action from the first day in office. If he takes action on his first day in office, why shouldn't we?
What is more important: to
repeal Obamacare (which he actually didn't do) or to keep nuclear weapons
off the hands of a sociopath?
A headline that would summarize what is in the minds of billions of people around the world should read: "Vladimir Trump has officially been inaugurated as the illegitimate president of the Disunited States of America, a province of Russia."
Trump has undermined first NATO (calling it "obsolete" more than once) and then
the CIA (first ridiculing it for its gaffe on the weapons of mass destruction in
Iraq and then even comparing it with Nazi Germany).
How can millions of US citizen be so naive?
Who benefits if the CIA and NATO are demolished by Trump?
Which country benefits? It doesn't take a PhD in political science: Russia.
Which is the only country that Trump has not criticized? Russia.
The suspicion that Vladimir Trump is a Russian agent, paid (see his tax returns) and instructed by Moscow to destroy the power of the USA is more justified than ever.
It is suicidal that the US Congress is allowing a suspected Russian agent to
take control of the US nuclear arsenal and of all strategic military assets of the USA around the world. We can only hope that generals and admirals are preparing to hide information from Vladimir Trump and disobey his orders.
We can only hope that the CIA and the NSA have a top-secret plan to curb the
power of this sociopath.
Alas, there is a chance that, instead, scores of CIA agents will resign and
scores of generals will retire, which was precisely Putin's goal.
As expected, Trump is appointing to his cabinet a grotesque group of:
Wall Street mafia (Steven Mnuchin, formerly of Goldman Sachs;
Rex Tillerson, the CEO of oil multinational Exxon, famous for the 1989 oil
spill in Alaska, the biggest of all times, and for a 2015 scandal about hiding
that it knew all along about its impact on climate change;
billionaire Wilbur Ross, better known as the "king of bankruptcy";
fast-food billionaire Andrew Puzder);
borderline war criminals (Mike Pompeo, who defended the CIA's torture program, as director of the CIA?);
certified racists (Stephen Bannon, Jeff Sessions, Michael Flynn);
friends of Putin (abovesaid Michael Flynn as National Security Adviser?),
family members (Jared Kushner),
and plain idiots (Rick Perry, who wanted to eliminate
the Department of Energy, to lead the Department of Energy?
Sonny Perdue, who prays in public for rain when there is a drought, as Secretary of Agriculture?
Ben Carson, a surgeon with no experience, to lead Housing Development?
Scott Pruitt, who denies that climate is changing, to lead the
Environmental Protection Agency that is supposed to protect us from climate change?)
This is a government designed to destroy the USA.
Using a tactic widely practiced by his master Putin, Trump has lambasted all the institutions that stand between him and absolute rule: political rivals (all the Republicans who opposed him or just criticized him plus Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren), journalists (from Megyn Kelly to CNN), judges (any judge who rules against his many frauds), generals (John Allen), secret services (the CIA's director), civil-rights activists (John Lewis), polls ("phony" and "rigged") and even comedians (Saturday Night Live).
He, the master of fake news, is accusing of fake news any media that dare publish the truth about him (100% Putin-ism). The call for censorship is even too clear. (And it is already effective: on January 17 all European media were reporting a lawsuit against Trump filed by a young woman, but none of the main US media mentioned it).
It is not a coincidence that Aleppo fell to the Russians at about the same time
that Russia got Trump elected president of the USA.
Russia has interfered in US politics the same way that it interfered in Syria,
trying to create the same kind of civil war.
Putin and the radical right-wing media are carrying out an attack to the core of the US democracy.
Russia has learned that it can destabilize the West without any need for
massive military operations: just surgical strikes in Ukraine and Syria that
send shock waves throughout Europe, and fake news that send shock waves
among the low-tech low-education blue-collar masses of the USA.
Putin understood that now in the USA everything happens in cyberspace: those who control cyberspace control society.
Putin is man of the year 2016.
Putin ended 2016 winning the war in Syria against the West and installing
a puppet dictator in the USA.
Russia has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world and now indirectly also controls the nuclear arsenal of the USA.
Putin convinced the world that the USA is not to be trusted in the long term,
convinced NATO members that NATO will not defend them (the way Russia would),
and convinced Europeans that the European Union is not protecting their
citizens the way Russia protects Russians.
When, upon hearing news of Trump's victory, the Russian parliament
gave Putin a standing ovation, it was totally deserved.
Do not underestimate the consequences of fake news.
The trouble in the Middle East started precisely with fake news: that the
Holocaust never happened, that Zionists stole land from the Palestinians (they actually bought it legally under the laws of the Ottoman Empire), that the USA
invaded Iraq to steal the oil, that Muslims had nothing to do with the 2001 terrorist attacks, etc. When i was in the Middle East in 2005, people routinely
told me that thousands of Muslims had been killed in the streets of New York
in retaliation for the 2001 attacks: in reality not a single Muslim was killed,
but fake news like this one were fueling the "insurrection" against the USA.
News media like Al Jazeera became masters of fake news, and sowed the seeds
of today's hatred between Sunnis and Shiites.
The result of all these fake news was the civil wars in Iraq and Syria.
Fox News' campaign of lies and exaggerations has had the same effect, and
the fake news spread in the USA by Russia and other radical right-wing
supporters of Donald Trump could end up having the same effect:
fueling a civil war between "blue" and "red" states.
Blue states are 100% justified in being fed up that the red states (generally
poorer and backwards, and therefore more gullible when it comes to fake news) end up determining who becomes the most powerful person
in the world, a power bestowed on this person largely by the science and
technology of the blue states.
And do not ignore the problems that created this bigger problem: the USA has
weird electoral rules that are often undemocratic
(see Do not get over it).
Worse: it does not have a law
to limit the power of the president to start a nuclear war: the president can launch a nuclear attack without asking for anybody's permission.
After spending decades telling the world that no rogue state and no crazy
politician should be allowed to get near a nuclear bomb, the USA has just given
control of 3,000 nuclear bombs to a sociopath.
Congress urgently needs to reform the constitution to make sure that 1. the will
of the people is implemented, and 2. keep the president from unilaterally
launching a nuclear strike.
Trump has told Merkel that Germany made a "catastrophic" mistake in accepting one million refugees. Who made the bigger mistake: Germany that accepted one million honest law-abiding refugees, or the USA that accepted a crook and sociopath supported by Russia as its president? Which country is becoming "great again": Germany that inspires billions of people around the world or the USA that has to be ashamed of the most ignorant and dishonest leader in the world and will be
completely isolated in the free democratic world?
"Vladimir" Trump is determined to turn "America the great" into a poor and defenseless region of Russia, a Dagestan or Khakassia, instead of taking inspiration from Germany.
As a friend said, this time God did not bless America (Putin did).
Accused of not paying taxes during a debate with Hillary Clinton, Trump quipped: "That makes me smart." Clinton's rebuttal "What does that make the rest of us?"
is still a good question for Trump voters to ask themselves.
(Other articles on Vladimir Trump: click here)
TM, ®, Copyright © 2017 Piero Scaruffi All rights reserved.
Back to the world news
A selection of cute "macros" from the web:
- (january 2017)
"Lock Him Up": Trumpism and the UNITED states .
Ironically, Trump (who is obviously not a real Republican but just a selfish amoral crook) has a real chance to unite the country. Read below and you'll see that on many issues he is more of a socialist than Barack Obama (and this man who divorced twice and boasted about his extramarital sex is obviously way less religious than Hillary Clinton or the Obamas).
- Trumpism and the Republican Party
- The Republican Party would have never approved a socialist agenda of infrastructure spending and anti-corporate legislation if a Democratic president had proposed it. It might accept it now that it comes from a radical right-wing president (just like it took a Republican right-wing president to pull out of Vietnam and make peace with China).
- Trump has insulted only two Democrats (Hillary "Lock her up" Clinton and Elizabeth "Pocahontas" Warren) but he has insulted scores of powerful Republicans in the Senate, from Paul Ryan to John McCain. You can bet that these powerful brahmins are just waiting for a chance to get back at him.
- Trump is a communist in disguise. He offered a firm advantages in order for that firm to keep 1,000 jobs in the USA. What about all the competitors of this firm, who are suddenly at a disadvantage? He told Apple to bring back jobs from overseas (who will buy Apple products made in the USA that cost twice the products made by competitors overseas?) Will Trump subsidize Apple too? What about Apple's competitors in the USA? Who else will get Trump's subsidies to keep jobs in the USA? The Republican Party strongly opposed Obama's actions in 2009 to salvage Detroit's car manufacturers on the ground that government intervention stifles competition and distorts markets, which is absolutely correct. Republicans would have strongly opposed any attempt by a Democratic president to reward a company over others. Trump is telling US companies what to do like the old Soviet regime used to: government picks winners and losers. Trump is more aligned with the left-wing of the Democratic Party than with his own party.
- The USA is witnessing a realignment of ideologies. The "left" used to be defender of the proletariat (the blue-collar class), but it has now become the defender of the high-tech white-collar jobs. The next step for Trumpism will be to convince the poorest ethnic minorities that the Democratic Party is no longer their defender. This is clearly possible because the poorest minorities are still the poorest. For example, Democrats never found the gut to tell black communities that the problem is not police brutality but the brutality of too many young black males. If you don't count young black males, the crime rate in the USA is not too much higher than in Europe, but this is a statistic that you can only whisper to your closest friends because it is politically incorrect. If Donald Trump becomes the first president to say it loud and clear, he may actually win over that minority.
- Trumpism and the Democratic Party
- The problem that Trump has with the Democratic Party is very simple: Hillary Clinton won the election by almost three million votes, Trump lost it. Anything that Trump does claiming to have a mandate from the people is simply illegitimate: he does NOT have a mandate from the people.
- It doesn't help that Trump behaves like a sore loser. Trump: you lost the popular vote, admit it and get over it.
- Trumpism and Science
- Scientists and inventors of the USA (especially in the so-called "blue state" that voted overwhelmingly against Trump) have to think long and hard whether they want to continue research that will help their government remain the world's superpower. All the scientists who worked in and for Germany in the 1930s lived to regret that they directly helped a sociopath like Hitler harm millions of people. Let us not repeat the same mistakes over and over again.
- If you believe that Trump could engineer the next big terrorist attack, support torture, cause genocides, crack down on dissent, lead to a climate disaster, silence the media and increase the gap between rich and poor, why would you "work" for him? why would you want to help him in any form or fashion to achieve such heinous goals?
- This is particularly true of Silicon Valley which, alone, provides the US government with most of the technology to fight wars, to spy on citizens and, potentially, to control all information in the country. Silicon Valley, Boston, Seattle, New York, New Jersey, Maryland and Chicago (that together constitute the vast majority of the high-tech world) need to study the words "civil disobedience". And, of course, "secession".
- Silicon Valley is being agnostic about Trump because it smells opportunities: military investment would bring back the age of the DARPA-funded military investments that triggered the first boom of Silicon Valley; and deregulation is always welcome by Silicon Valley's rampant capitalism.
- But forcing Apple and the other high-tech firms to bring jobs back to the USA is a great idea if you want to boost the business of Apple's competitors around the world and destroy the high-tech industry of the USA. Apple, Google, Facebook and so forth desperately need one thing: Chinese and Indian immigrants. The last thing they need is the uneducated blue-collar dropouts of the Midwest and the rednecks of the South who voted for Trump's "Let's make America great again". Silicon Valley "is" great, as great as any center of technology has ever been.
- Trumpism and False News
TM, ®, Copyright © 2016 Piero Scaruffi All rights reserved.
- Trump won the Midwestern states thanks to a campaign of scientific lying and inventing false news. This is not going away any time soon. It works. If you keep repeating a lie, eventually people think it's true. As his role model Adolf Hitler wrote: "The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed" (Mein Kampf). The similaries between Trump's USA and 1933 Germany are obvious: Hitler was elected with a minority of votes, after promising to make Germany great again.
- I have very intellectual friends who rarely read more than 140 characters. If intellectuals rarely read more than 140 characters, imagine the low-income individuals with no college degrees.
- Like it or not, we now officially live in the age of fake news.
Back to the world news
- (january 2017)
"Lock Him Up": Trumpism and the World .
TM, ®, Copyright © 2016 Piero Scaruffi All rights reserved.
- Trumpism and North Korea
- Trump's obsession with the "Iran deal" is a bit comic. Iran poses no threat to the USA, and in fact it has been fighting the same enemies (Al Qaeda, Taliban, ISIS, etc). I doubt that Trump knows where North Korea is, but that country constitutes the main immediate danger for the USA. North Korea does have a nuclear weapon (unlike Trump's obsession Iran) and will soon have missiles capable of striking the USA (unlike Iran). Very soon it will be capable of striking Hawaii, if not Alaska, if not California. The West Coast is disposable for Trump because it is mostly inhabited by liberals, but it may be bad publicity when North Korea wipes out Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Boeing and Intel. North Korea has benefited from the hesitation of all the previous US presidents. Far from being an irrational regime, its regime is very rational: once it has nuclear weapons, it will be able to extort great deals from the powers and revitalize its economy. Then all the other countries of the world will learn the lesson: look at what happened to Iraq and Libya that did NOT have nuclear bombs, and look what happens to North Korea that has it.
- Trumpism and China
- China obviously wins if the USA withdraws from the transpacific trade agreement (the TPP). Trade deals are not meant only for economic growth: they are also strategic long-term alliances. If the USA withdraws from the TPP, the small countries of Asia will be pushed into China's orbit without any need for China to use force. Killing the TPP is the biggest possible gift to China.
- China has now close relatioships with Cambodia, which is basically its Trojan horse into ASEAN (ASEAN cannot approve any anti-Chinese policy because of Cambodia's veto) and has made peace with the Philippines. 2016 was the first year in a decade that the USA and Cambodia did not stage joint military exercises. It was also the first year that Cambodia and China staged military exercises.
- President Xi was a start at the 2016 Davos meeting of the world's most powerful people. He delivered a speech in which he defended globalization and the environment, two items in which the USA used to be leading. Now the USA is following (maybe not even following).
- Trump's USA is a model of instability. Xi's China is a model of stability. Which country would choose the USA as a friend over China?
- Nobody (not even in China itself) truly understands why the USA tolerates that Google, Facebook, Twitter, and even scaruffi.com are banned in China while no Chinese product is banned in the USA. "Fair" trade with China means that all US products get a chance in China. This will be the first test of how serious Trump was about "fair trade".
- Trump's protectionist policies could lead to a much stronger dollar, which means much cheaper imports, in which case East Asia and Latin America would not need any trade agreement (neither TPP nor NAFTA) to easily "steal" jobs from the USA.
- A surge in US military presence may actually tame the hawks in China. Hawks prevail when the military gap with the USA seems to close and it makes sense to invest in closing it completely. Doves prevail when the gap is so big that it makes no sense to even try to compete militarily: better invest in lifting 700 million people out of poverty. His increased military spending is probably a really bad idea because we just don't have the money, BUT it may actually have a positive effect on Asia. In every major nation there is a constant fight between hawks and doves. The doves win whenever it is impossible to catch up with the regional power. The hawks win whenever the gap with the regional power shrinks and it looks like it is possible to catch up. Make the gap huge and they all focus on domestic issues (the doves win). Let the gap shrink and they all focus on building up the military. So... that's China. Right now the hawks are winning because the gap with the USA has shrunk and the hawks have a convincing argument that China can catch up militarily. If the USA builds an extra 100 warships and deploys them in front of China, it will help the doves: impossible to catch up with the USA, let's just focus on our economy. There's a problem though: the USA, not China, is broke.
- Trump wants to spend China into oblivion like Reagan spent the Soviet Union into oblivion: first of all, the Polish Pope and the Afghan mujaheddins may have done more to destroy the Soviet Union than Reagan's military spending; but, secondly, why do we think that the USA could spend China into oblivion rather than China spending the USA into oblivion? Who has the cash these days? The USA needs to borrow money from China in order to build its warships and warplanes.
- In 2016 these are the countries with the highest-achieving primary and secondary pupils: 1. Singapore; 2. South Korea; 3. Taiwan; 4. Hong Kong; 5. Japan (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study, TIMSS 2016). There is no China, but notice that 1, 3 and 4 are Chinese regions, located outside main China but still inhabited by Chinese. These three regions have left the USA behind. It is just a matter of time before declining US education is passed by rising Chinese education. Trump has proven to millions of US families that it is not worth studying.
- Trumpism and the Middle East
- If Trump repeals the nuclear deal with Iran and reinstates sanctionsagainst Iran, the Middle East will officially divide into a Sunni-Jewish alliance, stretching from Egypt to Saudi Arabia via Israel, and a Shiite alliance, stretching from Lebanon to Yemen via Syria, Iraq and Iran.
- Islamic terrorism in the USA is largely an invention of the radical right-wing media and their political emanations. The fact is that there has been no real terrorist attack in the USA since 2001. The mass killings credited to ISIS are simply part of the pattern of mass killings in a country that has more guns than driver licenses. Mathematically speaking, the chances that you will be killed by a terrorist is much lower than the chance of being killed by your neighbor or a family member.
- ISIS is not an enemy of the USA more than the intellectuals of France are. Nor is Iran. Both have wildly different goals in life. ISIS is certainly an enemy of the Shiites (it started out by fighting against Syria and Iraq, both supported by Shiite Iran), and the USA is currently allied with Jews (Israel) and Sunnis (Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, etc), who are on the same side of ISIS (like it or not); so the USA is not necessarily an enemy of ISIS. If the USA is indeed fighting ISIS and Al Qaeda, then Iran is on the same side: Iran was fighting both the Taliban and Al Qaeda way before the USA did, and Iran was the first country to fight ISIS when it started expanding in Syria. The USA never truly made up its mind about whom it is fighting and with whom.
- The Middle East is a major crisis for Europe, not for the USA. It is Europe that has to deal with millions of refugees, and it is Europe that imports huge amounts of oil from the Middle East. The reason that keeps dragging the USA into the Middle East is called Israel. Too many US presidents took orders from the Israeli prime minister, and Trump has promised to do the same. (See The USA is a banana republic)
- The Middle East is a major opportunity for Russia, that had no allies before the Syrian civil war broke out, not for the USA, that will retain its allies whichever way the Syrian civil war ends. Trump will help his boss Putin if the USA fights the same enemy that Russia has there.
- Iran, on the other hand, is a major opportunity for the USA, that could turn an enemy into the ally that it once was. Alas, the prime minister of Israel (that de facto controls the US Congress) is opposed to Iran and Trump's boss in Moscow does not want a US-Iran alliance.
- Trumpism and Russia: see Russia and the USA have more in common than they would like to admit
- Trumpism and Europe:
- Trump is a dividing figure in Europe just like he is in the USA, but, like in the USA, sentiments are ambivalent about the crook in chief.
- A large segment of European public opinion is appalled that all European leaders keep excusing Islam. When Trump openly blames Islam for the endless terrorist attacks that are destroying the Western way of life, it is not shudders of fear that spread through Europe but sighs of hope that someone will finally use common sense.
- Climate change is a big issue in Europe. Trump does not believe that it is a big deal, most Europeans do... and blame the USA for it.
- From the European standpoint, the big mess in Iraq, Syria and Lybia was caused by US incompetence and ignorance. Trump has criticized the George W Bush wars, the first Republican to do so. That's a promising sign for Europeans; but Trump also embodies more than anyone else US incompetence and ignorance; and that is definitely not a promising sign for Europeans who had to live through eight years of George W Bush incompetence and ignorance.
- Trump is the first US president ever who does not support European unification (he loudly praised the British for leaving the EU). Suddenly, Europeans realize that they may have to take care of themselves. Smaller countries on the eastern front suddenly realize that the USA (run by a Putin stooge like trump) would not protect them from a Russian invasion: who will? France? Germany? Britain? Not very likely in these days and times.
- Coincidence or not, Western Europe was at war for more than 1600 years before the USA occupied it in 1945. The longest period of peace in Western Europe since the fall of the Roman Empire coincides with the Pax Americana that protected Western Europe against Nazism first and Communism later. The Pax Americana was already weakened by Obama, who wasn't willing to intervene in Ukraine, and may be terminated under Trump. Then we will find out if the Europeans have truly become peaceful.
- The only Western European politicians who were ecstatic about Trump's victory were the radical right-wing leaders Geert Wilders (Netherlands), Frauke Petry (Germany) and Marine Le Pen (France). They share Trump's racist, nationalist and anti-liberal views. Poland and Hungary are already ruled by radical right-wing populist autocrats. Italy's equivalent of these nationalist parties is the party run by a comedian who goes by the name Grillo (Cricket), a movement that was preceded by the racist Northern League in a government coalition with the populist right-wing tycoon Silvio Berlusconi (does it ring a bell? Tea Party + Donald Trump?). These are all "Euro-skeptics", hostile to the great international organizations such as European Union, euro and NATO. All of them want to make their country "great again".
- Many in Britain viewed membership of their country in the European Union as a sort of European occupation, almost as if France had achieved Napoleon's goal or, worse, Germany had achieved Hitler's goal. These British people probably view Trump as a restorer of the traditional order, in which the Anglosaxons stand up against (not join) continental Europe.
- Donald Trump and British prime minister Theresa May want to resurrect the kind of relationship that Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher enjoyed in the 1990s. The Reagan-Thatcher revolution mainly relied on a common enemy (the Soviet Union) but also on the "trickle-down" economics that probably is the single most important cause of (ironically) the impoverishment of the rust-belt towns that today vote for Trump and May. Last but not least, the end of the Cold War combined with their passion for free trade, turned the developing world into one giant offsourcing paradise (e.g. China and India), which is precisely the event that crippled the manufacturing base in the USA, i.e. impoverished the people who now vote for Trump.
- Ironically, Trump also has a real chance to unite the West, but around very different values than the idealistic values of the last 70 years. For better and for worse, many Europeans are increasingly hungry for someone who says what Trump said about Islam, immigration, the EU, NATO, etc.
- Who would have predicted 70 years ago (at the end of World War II) that in 2017 the last hope of Western liberal-democratic ideology would be Germany: Angela Merkel was the only world leader who, when congratulating Trump for his victory, reminded Trump of the value of (quote) "democracy, freedom and respect for the law and the dignity of man, independent of origin, skin color, religion, gender, sexual orientation or political views." Germany may find itself alone again, but this time on the side of defending democracy against the rising tides of fascism in Britain, the USA and the rest of Europe.
Back to the world news
More articles on Trump
- January-December 2016
- January-December 2015
- January-December 2014
- January-December 2013
- January-December 2012
- January-December 2011
- January-December 2010
- January-December 2009
- January-December 2008
- January-December 2007
- January-December 2006
- January-December 2005
- January-December 2004
- January-December 2003
- January-December 2002
- January-December 2001
- January-December 2000
- January-December 1999