To advertise on this space
Per inserzioni pubblicitarie
Um hier Werbung zu machen

Germany

All the news not fit to print
To advertise on this space
Per inserzioni pubblicitarie
Editorial correspondence | Back to Politics | Back to the world news

Articles on Germany after 2007
Merkel's model of national unity
A lesson to be learned
Articles on Germany before 2007

  • (september 2007) Merkel's model of national unity. Angela Merkel is now officially the most popular chancellor in the history of post-war Germany, with an approval rating of above 70% that is twice the approval rating of George W Bush in the USA and almost three times the approval rating of Chirac when he was president of France. In fact, very few leaders in the world enjoy such a high approval rating.
    The reason is mainly the economy, which is at least growing at a decent pace and is creating jobs for the first time in decades. However, even Merkel's allies admit that Merkel did not pass any major economic reform that would allow her to take credit for the economic recovery. It was her predecessor Schroeder who did. Whatever is happening today to Germany's economy is largely the result of a) Schroeder's reforms and b) the USA recovery. Since Merkel ousted Schroeder and Germans dislike George W Bush, it is hard for the German public to swallow the notion that they have to thank Schroeder and Bush for their mini-boom.
    Merkel's success is more likely due to her having found a simple way to deliver to the German nation what the German nation wants: a life without traumas. Merkel promised change, and one day she realized that, as much as the Germans disliked Schroeder, she was about to lose the elections because of her insistence on change: Germans did not want change, they only wanted a more competent chancellor. Her margin of 17 points was fully eroded by the time they went to vote and she won by the slimmest of margins (so much so that she was forced into a parliamentary alliance with the opposition). Merkel learned what Germans want, and now delivers it. There is no more talk of dramatic reforms. She has left the system largely unchanged, relying on Schroeder's timid reforms to boost the economy enough to save Germany from collapse. Germans love the social system that takes care of them and their children from before birth to after death. They don't want to change it. They simply want good administrators to run it. During the post-war period, Germans have lost any sense of personal responsibility. Someone has always been taking care of them, both in military terms (the USA defended them from the Soviet Union) and in economic terms (the welfare system guaranteed a decent lifestyle no matter what). It would be very traumatic for them to take care of their own lives. All they want is to live in peace, without any major concerns for the future. And, yes, they are willing to pay higher taxes than Americans for that peace of mind.
    She has also been splendid in dealing with Islamic terrorism as a criminal issue, not a bellic issue: Bush calls it a "war" on terrorism, whereas Merkel simply lets the police investigate like in any other case of criminals plotting to break the law. The German public seems to like this approach much better than Bush's call for an international crusade against the evil forces of radical Islam. Terrorism is not an important factor in elections the way it is in the USA. In fact, Germans are more likely to distance themselves from politicians who emphasize the danger of terrorism.
    Merkel also understood that Germans are much more interested in environmental issues such as global warming than in political issues such as the Iraqi civil war. They don't want to know what will happen in Iraq, but they are very interested in knowing what will happen to an endangered species or to planet Earth. Thus she has personally invested in issues related to climate change to an extent that is unmatched by any other leader in the world. She is becoming the Al Gore of Europe (except that Al Gore did not become president).
    Of course, Merkel could be on borrowed time. Schroeder's reforms paid back nicely, but economists agree that they were not and are not enough. Germany is simply enjoying a side-effect of the world-wide economic boom, that mainly boosted exports of German high technology. To start with, the USA remains the second importer of German goods. The first, third, fourth, fifth and so forth to ninth place are all members of the European Union, which effectively makes the European Union an economic colony of Germany. China is a distant tenth importer of German goods. Russia is 14th and Japan is 15th. (See this article). A recession in the USA will almost certainly cause a major recession in Europe, and the combined effect of these events would have devastating consequences for Germany's unreformed economy. Merkel has learned not to talk about it anymore, but the danger is far from over. In 2007 Germany is celebrating a yearly growth rate of 2%: in the USA that is considered an economic crisis. In 2007 Germany is celebrating that unemployment declined to 9%: in the USA a 9% unemployment rate would be the worst rate since the end of the Great Depression of the 1930s.
    TM, ®, Copyright © 2007 Piero Scaruffi All rights reserved.
    Back to the world news | Top of this page

  • (April 2007) A lesson to be learned. Not only are Germany's exports booming again, but its main customers are the very Russia and China that people around the world complain are exporting too much and too easily. Germany's exports (last year they were almost a trillion of euros, a staggering amount) have been growing faster than Germany's dependence on Chinese imports (see for example this New York Times article).
    Germany needs to import even more oil than the USA, and Germany's manufacturers are under the same pressure from cheaper Asian products. Unlike their USA counterparts, German manufacturers cannot take advantage of the cheap labor of illegal immigrants (they must, by law, give their German workers some of the best and most expensive benefits in the world). Nonetheless Germany manages to do what the USA fails to do: export billions of goods to China. And without having to continuously sue China at the World Trade Organization.
    Germany makes one thing right: it makes the kind of high-tech products that nobody else can do and that the developing countries desperately need. While the USA is trying to export Britney Spears songs and Hollywood movies, Germany exports parts for ships, planes, and power plants.
    Europe too has to learn a lesson from Germany. Countries like France are struggling to resurrect their economies because of the internal resistance to change. Somehow Germany managed to achieve resurrection within the same constraints. Hence the miracle is possible. It takes, of course, even more discipline and hard work than it takes for the USA and Britain (where employers have a much easier time hiring and firing employees). When employees are so protected, the government has to work even harder to help the employers survive in the world. For all his grand talk, Chirac did very little to help French companies. The truth is that, even in the worst time, Germany always has more competent politicians than the rest of continental Europe. In the long-term, it is paying off.
    TM, ®, Copyright © 2007 Piero Scaruffi All rights reserved.
    Back to the world news | Top of this page

    Articles on Germany before 2007
Editorial correspondence | Back to the top | Back to Politics | Back to the world news